Tim Cook is a Hypocrite, And So Is Apple

Clifford Kvidahl:

Could not have said it better myself.

Originally posted on Zwinglius Redivivus:

Tim Cook hates Indiana’s new #RFRA.  Lots of people do.  But lots of people don’t run companies that rake in BILLIONS of dollars in profit whilst paying slave labor wages to the people who make those products.  Tim doesn’t like discrimination, but his sliding corporate pay scale discriminates every single day.

Furthermore, Tim, and Apple, discriminate against the poor every day by pricing their products out of the reach of most citizens of the world and many Americans.  We all know that Apple could easily distribute, for free, an iPad to every kid in the third world and still have money left over for their stockholders to grovel for.

So, Tim, go ahead, continue to complain about discrimination.  The only people who don’t see the hypocrisy are those of like mind who are driven more by ideology than by compassion for those discriminated against.

hyp

View original

Give me Grave Christianity

Originally posted on Abbey House Sojourner:

Please…

No more superficial Christianity

No more weak preaching

No more selfish jokes from the pulpit

No more omission of the realities of hell, or heaven

No more self-centered ‘worship’ songs

No more self-help sermons

No more man-pleasing pastors

No more yes-man associate pastors

No more best life now

No more listless homilies

No more shallow expositions

No more lazy exegesis

No more giftless churches

No more arrogant pulpits

No more silent congregations

No more wasted Sundays

No more Lord-less Lord’s Days

No more Zion-less pleas

No more Blood-less fellowship

No more grave-less Christianity

View original

#QOTD: The Apostolic Constitution on Baptism

Be ye likewise contented with one baptism alone, that which is into the death of the Lord; not that which is conferred by wicked heretics, but that which is conferred by unblameable priests, “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:” and let not that which comes from the ungodly be received by you, nor let that which is done by the godly be disannulled by a second. For as there is one God, one Christ, and one Comforter, and one death of the Lord in the body, so let that baptism which is unto Him be but one. But those that receive polluted baptism from the ungodly will become partners in their opinions. For they are not priests. For God says to them: “Because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee from the office of a priest to me.” Nor indeed are those that are baptized by them initiated, but are polluted, not receiving the remission of sins, but the bond of impiety. And, besides, they that attempt to baptize those already initiated crucify the Lord afresh, slay Him a second time, laugh at divine and ridicule holy things, affront the Spirit, dishonour the sacred blood of Christ as common blood, are impious against Him that sent, Him that suffered, and Him that witnessed. Nay, he that, out of contempt, will not be baptized, shall be condemned as an unbeliever, and shall be reproached as ungrateful and foolish. For the Lord says: “Except a man be baptized of water and of the Spirit, he shall by no means enter into the kingdom of heaven.” And again: “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.” But he that says, When I am dying I will be baptized, lest I should sin and defile my baptism, is ignorant of God, and forgetful of his own nature. For “do not thou delay to turn unto the Lord, for thou knowest not what the next day will bring forth.” Do you also baptize your infants, and bring them up in the nurture and admonition of God. For says He: “Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not” (6.3.15).

Enter to Win Our Commentary Club Giveaway

Originally posted on EerdWord:

CommentaryClubLogo_black&green
Scripture, says Gregory the Great, “is like a river with pools and shallows, where in one place the lamb may wade, in another the elephant may swim.”

Thus Eerdmans commentaries (often themselves a little like elephants in their girth) can be thought of as elephant swimming manuals, mapping out the deep pools in Scripture and demonstrating the best ways to navigate them.

So for all you elephants out there (is Eerdliphants too much of a stretch?), we’re delighted to announce the Eerdmans Commentary Club, a new online community that will keep you informed about commentary news, upcoming releases, new author announcements, sales, and members-only discounts.

Want to join the club? It’s easy: just visit the site and click the big “Join the Club” button. As an added bonus, if you join before noon EST on Friday, March 13, you’ll automatically be entered in our March Commentary Giveaway. Three winners, chosen at random, will win their choice…

View original 85 more words

#QOTD: Paul and James in Pseudo-Clementine

“And when matters were at that point that they should come and be baptized, some one of our enemies, entering the temple with a few men, began to cry out, and to say, ‘What mean ye, O men of Israel? Why are you so easily hurried on? Why are ye led headlong by most miserable men, who are deceived by Simon, a magician?’ While he was thus speaking, and adding more to the same effect, and while James the bishop was refuting him, he began to excite the people and to raise a tumult, so that the people might not be able to hear what was said. Therefore he began to drive all into confusion with shouting, and to undo what had been arranged with much labour, and at the same time to reproach the priests, and to enrage them with revilings and abuse, and, like a madman, to excite every one to murder, saying, ‘What do ye? Why do ye hesitate? Oh, sluggish and inert, why do we not lay hands upon them, and pull all these fellows to pieces?’ When he had said this, he first, seizing a strong brand from the altar, set the example of smiting. Then others also, seeing him, were carried away with like madness. Then ensued a tumult on either side, of the beating and the beaten. Much blood is shed; there is a confused flight, in the midst of which that enemy attacked James, and threw him headlong from the top of the steps; and supposing him to be dead, he cared not to inflict further violence upon him.”

“But our friends lifted him up, for they were both more numerous and more powerful than the others; but, from their fear of God, they rather suffered themselves to be killed by an inferior force, than they would kill others. But when the evening came the priests shut up the temple, and we returned to the house of James, and spent the night there in prayer. Then before daylight we went down to Jericho, to the number of 5000 men. Then after three days one of the brethren came to us from Gamaliel, whom we mentioned before, bringing to us secret tidings that that enemy had received a commission from Caiaphas, the chief priest, that he should arrest all who believed in Jesus, and should go to Damascus with his letters, and that there also, employing the help of the unbelievers, he should make havoc among the faithful; and that he was hastening to Damascus chiefly on this account, because he believed that Peter had fled thither. And about thirty days thereafter he stopped on his way while passing through Jericho going to Damascus. At that time we were absent, having gone out to the sepulchres of two brethren which were whitened of themselves every year, by which miracle the fury of many against us was restrained, because they saw that our brethren were had in remembrance before God.”
Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions 1.70-71

Note the allusion to Acts 9 and Paul’s travels to Damascus. This is most likely not a historical account of what happened, but it is interesting nonetheless.

One Year Ago Today…

Clifford Kvidahl:

Help Jim retire!

Originally posted on Zwinglius Redivivus:

I wrote

Some time back when I had finished my intro to Zwingli, Cliff K. and I were chatting and he asked me if I could recommend some resources that Logos would find useful for a new collection of Zwingli’s works they were putting together.  It took me about 10 minutes to have a list of materials to him and as an aside I said that they could include my new Zwingli intro too.

the-person-the-pew-commentary-series

To my surprise, they actually wanted to.  Further, to my surprise, the folk there asked if I were working on anything else that they could add to their library.  At the time, of course, the commentary series I’ve been working on for, what is it now, almost a decade, aimed at a very general readership of the bible and subtitled ‘For the Person in the Pew’, was over 2/3rds complete but I wasn’t quite ready to…

View original 414 more words